Case studies

Selected cases from our practice, with a brief account of the circumstances, proceedings, and outcome.

Criminal cases

Exempted from criminal liabilityArticle 222Criminal Code · para. 1

Both defendants exempted from criminal liability under a guarantor arrangement

Kaunas Regional Court exempted both defendants, charged under Criminal Code Articles 222(1) and 300(1), from criminal liability under a two-year guarantor arrangement, with no security deposit.

Prison sentence avoidedArticle 300Criminal Code · para. 3

Court applies Criminal Code Article 54(3) and imposes a 25 MGL fine instead of imprisonment

Part of the case was discontinued because the time limit for entering a conviction had expired. For the remaining charge, the court applied Criminal Code Article 54(3) and imposed a fine of 25 MGL (EUR 941).

Investigation discontinuedArticle 260Criminal Code · para. 3

Investigation discontinued for insufficient evidence against the client

The pretrial investigation under Criminal Code Articles 260(3) and 199(2), involving 17.118 kg of amphetamine, was discontinued for insufficient evidence of the client’s guilt.

AcquittedArticle 228Criminal Code · para. 2

Acquittal upheld after prosecutor’s appeal rejected

The first-instance court acquitted the client under Criminal Code Article 228(2). The appellate court rejected the prosecutor’s appeal and upheld the judgment.

Sentence reducedArticle 260Criminal Code · para. 2

Appellate court reduces prison sentence from 8 years and 6 months to 4 years

On appeal, the client was acquitted under Criminal Code Article 260(2), convicted under Article 260(1), and his prison sentence was reduced from 8 years and 6 months to 4 years.

AcquittedArticle 182Criminal Code · para. 1

Kaunas District Court acquits client because the alleged offense was not proved against her

The charge under Criminal Code Article 182(1) was not established. Kaunas District Court acquitted the client because it had not been proved that she committed the offense.

Damages awarded74,947LTL awarded

Kaunas Regional Court awards LTL 74,947.07 on a civil claim in criminal proceedings

Kaunas Regional Court awarded our client LTL 74,947.07 on a civil claim in criminal proceedings. The award was made in Lithuanian litas.

AcquittedArticle 182Criminal Code · para. 2

All five defendants acquitted; prosecutor’s appeal rejected

Kaunas District Court acquitted all five defendants, and the appellate court rejected the prosecutor’s appeal and upheld the acquittals.

AcquittedArticle 229Criminal Code

Client acquitted of failing to perform official duties

The charge under Criminal Code Article 229 was not established, and Palanga City District Court acquitted the client.

Civil cases

Legal facts establishedInheritanceacceptance by possession

Court confirms acceptance of an inheritance through possession and management of the property

The court established the legally significant facts confirming that the clients had accepted their inheritances through possession and management of the inherited property.

Claim dismissedHonorand dignity

Defamation claim dismissed; defendants awarded all attorney fees

The court dismissed the claim concerning honor and dignity, including the demand for LTL 75,000 for nonfinancial harm, and awarded our clients all attorney fees.

Damages awardedCMRConvention

LTL 65,499.62 awarded for lost cargo

Kaunas City District Court granted the client’s claim in full, awarding LTL 65,499.62 in damages plus litigation costs against the defendant.

Claim dismissedContractcontract dispute

Claim to terminate a contract dismissed; decision upheld on appeal

The first-instance court rejected the claim to terminate the client’s contract and return the payments made under it. The appellate court upheld that decision.

Claim grantedLandco-owners’ use arrangement

Court adopts the client’s proposed arrangement for using jointly owned land

The co-owners could not agree on how to use their shared land. The court adopted our client’s proposed arrangement and dismissed the counterclaim.

Claim grantedConstructionreconstruction

Court recognizes clients’ right to reconstruct part of a house without a co-owner’s consent

A co-owner refused consent to reconstruct an unfinished house. The court recognized our clients’ right to proceed without that consent, and the appellate court upheld the decision.

Appeal successfulBoundariesland dispute

Appellate court overturns an unfavorable judgment against our clients

The appellate court overturned the unfavorable first-instance judgment.

Schedule a meeting

AddressVilniaus g. 64A, Kaunas, LT-44289
Phone+370 682 34336Emailinfo@advokatasvasiliauskas.lt
Office hoursMon–Fri: 9:00 a.m.–5:00 p.m. · Sat–Sun: closed