Kaunas District Court acquits client because the alleged offense was not proved against her

Article 182 Criminal Code · para. 1

Stage at which the case concluded

Pretrial investigationFirst instanceAppealCassation (Supreme Court)

Our client was charged under Criminal Code Article 182(1) with fraudulently obtaining another person’s property for her own benefit without payment.

The court considered whether the evidence established that our client had committed the offense.

Kaunas District Court acquitted the client because it had not been proved that she committed the offense.

Outcome

The charge under Criminal Code Article 182(1) was not established. Kaunas District Court acquitted the client because it had not been proved that she committed the offense.

More cases in this practice area

Exempted from criminal liabilityArticle 222

Both defendants exempted from criminal liability under a guarantor arrangement

Prison sentence avoidedArticle 300

Court applies Criminal Code Article 54(3) and imposes a 25 MGL fine instead of imprisonment

Schedule a meeting

AddressVilniaus g. 64A, Kaunas, LT-44289

Phone+370 682 34336 Emailinfo@advokatasvasiliauskas.lt

Office hoursMon–Fri: 9:00 a.m.–5:00 p.m. · Sat–Sun: closed