Investigation discontinued for insufficient evidence against the client
Stage at which the case concluded
The case did not go to court.
Our client was suspected of unlawfully handling a very large quantity of psychotropic substances, specifically 17.118 kg of amphetamine, and smuggling those substances.
The suspected offenses fell under Criminal Code Articles 260(3) and 199(2). The pretrial investigation examined whether there was sufficient evidence of the client’s guilt.
After relevant witnesses and the suspects were interviewed, the investigation against our client was discontinued for insufficient evidence of guilt. The case did not go to court.
The pretrial investigation under Criminal Code Articles 260(3) and 199(2), involving 17.118 kg of amphetamine, was discontinued for insufficient evidence of the client’s guilt.